Tangible outcomes your board and auditors will care about
based on real multi-tenant deployments
fewer penalties, higher customer trust
clear investigations delivered in minutes
AI ensures accuracy for every client
Results vary by tenant mix, thresholds, and data quality.
adding customers means adding headcount, killing margin.
inconsistent triage creates rework and escalations.
missed response times trigger penalties and churn risk.
analysts waste time drafting SLA proof instead of solving cases.
Connect your SIEM and SOAR (multi-tenant supported). Models propose decisions, analysts approve or deny, and the system learns from every judgment.
Models return label + confidence; auto-close only where confidence ≥ tenant-defined threshold.
Deploy and configure Agents and Agentic Workflows to gather context, draft investigations, and produce tenant-ready reports. Analysts review and approve before final submission.
Outputs write back to SIEM/ITSM and roll into tenant-facing SLA views.
Every new tenant adds workload, but scaling headcount doesn't scale consistency. Larger teams introduce variance across shifts and analysts, while costs rise linearly and margins shrink. Arcanna lets you scale tenants per analyst, so your cost curve flattens and SLA quality stays predictable.
analyst headcount rises 1:1 with tenants; Arcanna multiplies capacity.
predictable SLA performance without ballooning payroll.
eliminate repetitive false positives; keep teams focused on real incidents.
connect via API; start in read-only within minutes
data, policies, and reporting scoped per tenant
deploy Decision Models on-prem, private cloud, or hybrid
Auto-close and reporting apply only where tenant thresholds are defined; all other alerts remain HITL.
Get started without workflow changes, scope auto-close and tenant reports as you build trust.
Read-only. No workflow changes.
Review decisions. Set tenant boundaries.
Only where thresholds are met.
Monitor KPIs. Ship tenant reports.
KPIs & Consistency
Outcomes based on real multi-tenant MSSP deployments across varied tenant mixes and alert patterns.
2.8–3.2×
Capacity lift
more alerts processed per analyst
60–85%
P1/P2 acceleration
faster handling of high-priority tickets
95%
Decision consistency
up from 55% before model deployment
70–85%
Benign pattern suppression
repetitive benign alerts auto-closed under tenant thresholds